Greece’s Development Law (Law 4887/2022, as amended and currently in force — most recently by Law 5203/2025, Government Gazette A’ 87/02.06.2025, and Law 5297/2026, A’ 64/28.04.2026) can fund a hotel investment. It can also leave one completely untouched. The difference isn’t the ambition of the project — it’s the eligibility structure of the specific call, the category of the property, the corporate structure of the investor, and whether anyone checked all of this before signing anything.

This article covers what the law actually funds, what disqualifies a project, and what international investors consistently get wrong before they apply.

Short answer: The Development Law can support hotel investments that constitute an initial integrated investment, meet the applicable star-category threshold, carry genuinely eligible costs, and have adequate own financing in place. The regime is not permanently open — each application cycle requires an active call, and the call’s specific terms can raise minimum thresholds above the statutory baseline. Establishing eligibility before signing any contract, placing any order or undertaking any commitment that could constitute a start of works is not optional.

Table of Contents

Which hotel projects can be supported

The law’s Tourism Investment Incentive scheme covers a defined set of project types. They are not interchangeable.

  • Establishment or expansion of hotel units of at least four stars. This is the primary pathway for new-build and expansion projects.
  • Integrated modernisation of units classified — or being upgraded — to at least three stars. The law requires that at least five years have elapsed since the unit began operating or since its previous integrated modernisation. A project submitted two years after the last renovation does not qualify on this ground.
  • Non-main tourist accommodation upgraded to at least three stars. This covers previously unclassified or lower-category accommodation provided the upgrade is genuine and documented.
  • Expansion or integrated modernisation of hotels that have ceased operation, provided the building has not changed use and the project upgrades the unit to at least four stars. Under the current 2nd Regions of Special Incentive call, the hotel must have ceased operation for at least two years before the application date.
  • Organised campsites of at least three stars. Establishment, expansion, and integrated modernisation are all eligible.
  • Hotels in traditional or listed buildings. Establishment and modernisation are eligible when the unit reaches at least three stars.
  • Glamping installations. Eligible under specific conditions, confirmed per call.

Integrated modernisation is a term of art, not a renovation budget. Replacing furniture, repainting rooms, or upgrading a pool area does not meet the threshold. The project must materially change the unit’s capacity, category, or service offering — and that assessment is made by the evaluation committee, not the investor.

One structural constraint that the current call cycle makes explicit — the 2nd call of the Regions of Special Incentive scheme (Government Gazette B’ 2199/17.04.2026), whose application deadline was extended to 24 July 2026: for that particular call, tourism projects are eligible only in the North Aegean Region, Samothraki and the islands expressly listed in Article 1(25) of the call. Tourism investment is not eligible in every region under every scheme. The general Tourism Investment Incentive scheme operates separately and covers the broader national territory — but its active call status must always be confirmed at the point of application.

The minimum investment size — and why the call changes it

The law sets statutory minimums by enterprise size:

Enterprise size Minimum eligible cost
Micro €100,000
Small €250,000
Medium €500,000
Large €1,000,000

These are statutory floors. The active call routinely sets higher minimums — particularly for tourism — and those figures govern the application. A project that meets the statutory threshold but falls below the call’s specific minimum is ineligible regardless of quality. Current-call distinction: under the 2nd Regions of Special Incentive call, the minimum eligible investment cost is €2 million, irrespective of enterprise size.

Enterprise classification is not self-declared. It follows the EU SME definition and must account for linked and partner enterprises. A newly incorporated Greek subsidiary of a large group does not qualify as a micro-enterprise. Getting this calculation wrong early can invalidate the entire application or result in aid recovery after disbursement — a considerably more expensive problem.

Forms of aid — and what large enterprises cannot access

Four instruments exist under the law:

  • Cash grant: direct capital subsidy on certified eligible costs, disbursed in tranches as the project progresses and passes verification.
  • Tax exemption: approved aid amount realised through non-payment of corporate income tax, up to the approved ceiling and within the prescribed period — up to 15 years.
  • Leasing subsidy: coverage of a portion of leasing instalments for qualifying equipment.
  • New-employment subsidy: contribution toward the gross wage cost of positions created directly by the investment.

Within the Tourism Investment Incentive scheme, large enterprises are excluded from the direct cash grant. They can access the tax exemption, leasing subsidy, and employment subsidy. This is a material distinction for capital planning — a large enterprise expecting a cash grant in its pro forma is working from a wrong assumption.

How the actual aid rate is calculated

The widely advertised “70% grant” is not a universal Development Law rate. The applicable aid ceiling depends on the project location, enterprise size, incentive type and the specific call — under the current Regional Aid Map, certain small and micro enterprises may face ceilings of up to 75%, while the direct cash-grant percentage may be limited to a proportion of that ceiling unless a specific enhanced category applies. Four variables determine the actual figure:

  • Location: The Regional Aid Map assigns different maximum intensities by region. North Aegean, Crete and Western Macedonia carry the highest base ceilings under the current Map (2022–2027), while South Aegean and Central Macedonia are lower and Attica materially lower. The exact ceiling must be confirmed for the project’s specific location.
  • Enterprise size: Small and medium enterprises receive a 10–20 percentage point uplift on the Map ceiling. Large enterprises do not.
  • Incentive type: The cash grant rate for micro, small, and medium enterprises is generally capped at 80% of the Map ceiling — not the full ceiling — with narrow exceptions for specific areas and investment categories.
  • Budget composition: Eligible costs that fall into categories with sub-caps (building costs are capped at 60% of total eligible costs for tourism projects) reduce the effective grant base.

The practical implication: two hotel projects with identical total budgets in different locations and different ownership structures can receive materially different aid amounts. The only way to establish the realistic figure is to run the actual calculation against the specific project data.

Which costs are eligible — and which never are

Depending on the nature of the project, eligible costs typically include construction, expansion, and integrated modernisation of buildings; electromechanical and special installations; new hotel equipment — kitchen, food and beverage, spa, and common areas; digital systems and eligible intangible assets; and accessibility and certain environmental or energy works.

For tourism projects specifically, building-related costs (construction, renovation, installations) cannot exceed 60% of total eligible costs. This sub-cap is enforceable and affects budgets where the construction component is dominant — which describes most hotel projects. Planning the budget without this constraint produces an eligibility calculation that doesn’t hold.

Generally ineligible costs include land acquisition, working capital, operating expenses, routine maintenance, the simple replacement of equipment and the value of assets already owned by the investor. A narrowly defined exception may apply to the acquisition by an SME of assets belonging to an establishment that has closed or would have closed without the acquisition, subject to the cumulative conditions of the law and the applicable call. These categories cannot otherwise be made eligible by labelling or budget restructuring — they are excluded under the law and the General Block Exemption Regulation.

The mistake that voids the entire project

The application must be submitted to the PS-AN platform before works begin or before any legally binding action that makes the investment irreversible.

The following are treated as a start of works: commencement of construction, a binding equipment order, or a construction or supply contract that creates an irreversible obligation. An investor who signs a building contract before submitting the application has — under current law and practice — rendered the entire project ineligible, irrespective of the project’s quality or the scale of the investment.

What does not constitute a start of works: the purchase of land, the issuance of planning permits, and preliminary feasibility studies. These can proceed before the application. But every agreement, letter of intent, or framework contract must be reviewed against the start-of-works definition before it is signed.

This is one of the most common and costly mistakes in Greek Development Law applications. It is also entirely avoidable.

What eligibility does not guarantee

A hotel project can be eligible in law and unviable in practice. Eligibility is a necessary condition, not a sufficient one. Before any application is drafted, a clear-eyed answer is needed on four questions:

  • Is the project feasible in licensing terms? Hotel projects require EOT classification, planning permissions, and in many cases environmental approvals. These are not formalities. The licensing timeline varies materially according to location, planning status, environmental requirements and the maturity of the technical file — and delays cascade directly into the implementation deadline set by the approval decision. A project-specific schedule must be established before the investment timetable is fixed.
  • What share of the total budget is genuinely eligible? The gap between total project cost and eligible expenditure can be material, particularly where the transaction includes land, acquisition value, financing costs, working capital or expenditure subject to sub-caps. The grant is applied to the eligible cost, not the total cost.
  • Is there adequate own financing? The law requires at least 25% of the aided cost to be financed without any form of State aid, public support, or public contribution. Bank financing counts toward this — but the bank must be confirmed, not assumed. Failure to secure the required financing can prevent implementation and may ultimately lead to revocation of the approval or recovery of aid where the applicable obligations are not met.
  • Does the project remain viable if the aid is lower than expected, or delayed? Disbursement follows certification, not approval. Payment is linked to certified implementation milestones and verification of the corresponding expenditure — the investor must finance the liquidity gap until the relevant tranche is certified and paid. Projections that depend on day-one grant receipt are structurally fragile.

Can a foreign investor apply?

Yes. Foreign nationality or foreign tax residence is not a ground for exclusion. The investing entity must hold an eligible legal form and be established in Greece — or maintain a registered branch — at the time required by the law and the specific call.

A foreign investor may generally hold up to 100% of the Greek company submitting the investment plan; separate restrictions or authorisation requirements may apply to the acquisition of property in designated border areas, particularly for non-EU investors. The corporate structure, financing, tax position, and compliance profile of that company must each independently satisfy the conditions. Eligibility is assessed at the level of the investing entity, not only at the level of the individual project.

The 360° Protocol — what it’s for

The real work doesn’t begin with drafting the application. It begins earlier — with an independent, documented answer to the question every serious investor should ask before committing capital: is this specific hotel project genuinely eligible, properly financeable, and commercially viable regardless of the subsidy outcome?

That is what the 360° Investment Readiness Protocol addresses. It is a structured investment-readiness assessment framework — not a grant-application service — that assesses the investment as a whole system before any capital moves:

  • legal and programme eligibility against the current call
  • technical and licensing readiness, including realistic timeline mapping
  • the genuinely eligible budget, after exclusions
  • the realistic aid level, by enterprise size and location
  • financing architecture and liquidity gap across the implementation period
  • commercial viability, execution risks, and exit route

The output is a documented Investment Readiness Index™ (0–100) with a grade — from S (exceptional: no material structural barriers within the assessed scope) to D (critical: readiness preconditions not met). We don’t only assess whether a project can receive aid. We assess whether it should proceed, with this location, this structure, this budget, and this financing.

Projects that do not meet the firm’s minimum readiness threshold do not proceed to an implementation mandate without a documented Remediation Plan. That boundary holds regardless of the commercial pressure in either direction.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a simple hotel renovation be supported?

Not automatically. The law requires integrated modernisation — a project that materially changes the unit’s capacity, category, or service level, carried out after at least five years from the unit’s launch or its previous modernisation. Routine maintenance, cosmetic refurbishment, or partial works are not sufficient. The distinction is assessed by the evaluation committee, not the investor.

Is the 70% grant rate what investors actually receive?

No. The “70%” figure may represent a Regional Aid Map ceiling or, in specific enhanced cases, the actual incentive rate — it is not a universal cash-grant rate. The final percentage depends on the location of the project, the size of the enterprise and its linked entities, the type of incentive chosen, enhanced-area status, and the terms of the active call. The cash grant for micro, small, and medium enterprises is generally capped at 80% of the Map ceiling — not the full ceiling — with specific exceptions. Large enterprises are excluded from the cash grant in the tourism scheme entirely.

Can an investor begin construction before applying?

No. The application must be submitted before any legally binding action that renders the investment irreversible. A binding construction contract, a confirmed equipment order, or the commencement of works before the application voids the project’s eligibility. Land purchase, planning permits, and preliminary studies are not a start of works — but every agreement must be reviewed against the legal definition before it is signed.

Can a foreign investor apply?

Yes — through an eligible investing entity established in Greece, or with a registered branch, at the time required by the specific call. Foreign ownership of up to 100% of the Greek investing entity is generally permissible, provided the corporate, financing, tax, and compliance conditions are met independently. Separate restrictions or authorisation requirements may apply to the acquisition of property in designated border areas, particularly for non-EU investors, and must be reviewed for the specific location and ownership structure.

Is the Development Law permanently open for hotel applications?

No. The Tourism Investment Incentive scheme operates through periodic calls. As of mid-2026, the only open call for tourism projects under the Development Law covers specific island and regional territories through the Regions of Special Incentive scheme — 2nd call, whose application deadline was extended to 24 July 2026. The general tourism scheme for broader national territory has not had a new call since 2023. This is a structural constraint, not a procedural detail — the absence of an active call means applications cannot be submitted regardless of project eligibility.

What happens after approval — when is the grant actually paid?

Grant disbursement does not occur automatically upon approval. An amount of up to 25%, 50% or 65% of the approved grant may be paid after certification that the project has implemented the corresponding 25%, 50% or 65% of its total approved investment cost; the balance is paid following completion and commencement of productive operation. The timing therefore depends on the execution pace, the submission of complete documentation and the completion of the applicable verification process. Investors must finance the liquidity gap until the relevant tranche is certified and paid.

Considering a hotel investment in Greece?

Before you purchase a property, sign any contract, or fix a budget, three questions need documented answers:

  • Is the project genuinely eligible — under the specific call that will be active when you apply?
  • What is the realistic aid level, after enterprise size, location, and budget composition are applied?
  • Does the investment remain viable if the aid is 20% lower than projected, or arrives 18 months later than planned?

Request a Preliminary Readiness Screening at readiness@aggelakakis.gr — 30 minutes, no charge — to establish whether a formal eligibility assessment and a full mandate are the right next step, before any capital is committed.

Legal & informational disclaimer. This article is for information only and does not constitute individualised legal, tax, financing, or investment advice. The eligibility of each project is assessed against the institutional framework in force, the General Block Exemption Regulation (GBER 651/2014), the Regional Aid Map 2022–2027, the active call, and the actual technical, corporate, and financing data of the investment. The 360° Protocol is a structured investment-readiness assessment framework; it does not constitute a legal, tax, or auditing opinion — those are issued, where required, by independent certified professionals — and it does not guarantee approval, disbursement, financing terms, or the decisions of public authorities. Legal framework and active calls reviewed on 15 July 2026.

Sources

Related Posts